Men and Women's Behavior: Social Scientists vs. Biologists

What are the differences in viewpoints between social scientists and biologists regarding human development?

Answer:

The difference in viewpoints between social scientists and biologists is that biologists often emphasize biological and genetic influences on human development, suggesting it's fairly fixed, whereas social scientists focus on the social and cultural factors that shape behavior, implying more flexibility and learned behaviors.

Social scientists and biologists have different perspectives on the factors that contribute to the differences in men and women's behavior.

While social scientists focus on the role of society and social interactions in shaping human behavior, biologists may emphasize the role of genetics and biology. Specifically, biologists might suggest that elements of human development, including behavioral differences between genders, are influenced by biological factors such as genetics and natural selection, implying that part of the development is fairly fixed.

On the other hand, social scientists often argue that human behavior is greatly influenced by social, cultural, and environmental factors, leading to the view that development is more flexible and learned. A difference between their points of view could be summarized as biologists stating that human development has a fixed biological basis, whereas social scientists emphasize the learned and social aspects of development.

Therefore, the most accurate statement from the options given might be number 2), which suggests 'Biologists state that human development is fairly fixed whereas social scientists do not.'